Pays the Bills ⤾

My CLE Seminars ⤾

None schedule now

BiblioAwesome ⤾
  • Typography for Lawyers
    Typography for Lawyers
    by Matthew Butterick
  • Point Made: How to Write Like the Nation's Top Advocates
    Point Made: How to Write Like the Nation's Top Advocates
    by Ross Guberman
  • iPad at Work
    iPad at Work
    by David Sparks
« Problems with Microsoft Vista, the new operating system. | Main | Franchise lawyer in New Orleans, Louisiana »
Sunday
Aug192007

And why not let Colonel Sanders babysit your chickens?

The Economist recently ran an article about the problems with getting compensation to homeowners who suffered damage from Katrina.  The article is subtitled How to stiff both Louisianans and the federal government. Here's the money quote:

"A typical private home-insurance policy covers wind damage, whereas
flood insurance is provided only by the federal government. The feds,
in the name of efficiency, allowed private insurers to settle both
flood and wind claims after Katrina. But if you were an insurance
company, and you had the choice of paying claims out of your own pocket
or someone else's, which would you pick?"

The head of the National Flood Insurance Program says that the claims were paid properly.  Perhaps a congressional inquiry will take up the subject.  Until then, it's all just speculation.

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.