Movie Recommendation: The Queen of Versailles

If you like documentaries, as I do, then I highly recommend The Queen of Versailles. The film profiles a rich timeshare guy named David Siegel who married a trophy wife (former Miss America, I believe) and they had a slew of kids. Despite the fact that they lived in a huge mansion in an exclusive gated community in Orlando, they wanted a bigger house.

They planned to build the biggest house in the United States. And they called it “Versailles” because it was modeled after the famous French Palace. The cost of the house would have been well over $100 million. This was before the real estate meltdown. The Siegels, like many other folks, were super-optmistic, and greedy. They were also pathetically self-absorbed, which is why they agreed to let a filmaker named Laura Greenfield follow them around for a few years. Big mistake.

The movie is fascinating because it starts like a typical reality TV show, except instead of Ozzy Osbourne or Gene Simmons, it’s a time-share real estate mogul. A big time-share business is more like a super-rock band (e.g. KISS or Black Sabbath) than you’d expect. So there is the voyeueristic appeal of seeing into the private lives of some quirky rich people, and the people that cater to them.

But what’s really interesting is how the Siegels come to grips with the economic downturn, which threatened every project he had going, including his cherished “Versailles.”

Early in the film, Siegel proudly claims that he alone was responsible for getting George Bush elected because of his work in Florida (which he says, on camera, he doesn’t want to discuss because what he did “might be illegal”). Flash forward to late 2008, when the bottom is dropping out of the financial system, and when Siegel and his tribe have to face some serious cutbacks.

He has to forego his limos and jet plane, and cut his household staff from 13 to 4. His wife’s dogs are pooping all over the mansion and no one has time to pick it up, so they step in crap from time to time. The kids don’t feed their lizard so it dies, and one of them complains it’s because no one would take her to the pet store to get more food (the house is filled with food and no doubt some of it would have saved the lizard).

Clearly they have too much stuff, and not enough people to manage it. But that doesn’t stop his wife from continuing to binge-shop, buying obscene amounts of toys that she has to cram into 3 cars. When they get home they pass through the garage, which is strewn with toys and bicycles that kids don’t play with anymore. They don’t have time to use all the crap they have, much less take care of it.

In the end, Siegel is bitter and astonished that his empire has crumbled. He says his kids they may have to get real jobs when they graduate from high school, and that they’ll have to borrow money for college (he never put any away for their college education). He blames his misfortune on greedy bankers, and never once acknowledges any responsibility for miscalculation or excessive borrowing.

And now that the film is out and getting attention, he’s even more bitter (and unable to accept responsibility). So he’s suing the filmaker for defamation. But a U.S. Judge doesn’t seem to believe his case has merit. What a shock!

One of my favorite parts of the movie is when Siegel is talking to the Orlando real estate agent who is supposed to find a buyer for Versailles (which is only half-way finished). The agent is supposed to be an expert in luxury properties, but she keeps pronouncing ‘Versailles’ with an ‘s’ at the end. It’s a small thing, yet somehow compelling.

Many of the people in the movie have lots of money (or had it), but virtually none of them have any self-awareness. Apparently, that can lead to big problems.

What would you do if...?

The other day I met Benjamin Reese, actually the Friday before Gustav hit. He's a really interesting guy and I liked him a lot right off the bat. He mentioned this film that he had been working on and editing for many many hours, but which got messed up due a computer problem. He tried to show us a brief clip of the shortened version (post-computer glitch), but we had technical difficulties with that too.

He finally got it all fixed up (now that Gustav has passed) and I think it's really amazing. It's based on a single question, a really provocative question. Check it out.

Read More

My Oscar pick for Best Movie

I left the movie theater feeling I had seen an important movie, a powerfully obtuse and yet highly unsettling story about several different people around the world whose lives seem to be connected in some strange way.  Babel will probably win the award for Best Picture tonight because, even though its message is hard to decipher, it's obviously somethnig that is supposed to enhance social consciousness.  Hollywood loves to award movies like this.

But if they decided not to go with the 'social consciousness' angle then maybe they'll give the award to The Departed, which featured an all-star cast of great actors: NIcholson, Sheen, Baldwin, DiCaprio, Damon, and Wahlberg.  Martin Scorsese has never won an Oscar, but they'd be more likely to honor him with a Best Director award. 

The Oscar for Best Picture rarely has been awarded to a comedy, which is why Little Miss Sunshine seems like a longshot.  But 'longshot' is the fuel that has propelled this movie all along.  I saw LMS the other night and it is one of my favorite movies ever.  It's got it all: a great script that is tight and guards a secret message that is poorly hidden in the title and then painted across each character's fervent quest.  In some ways, the movie reminds me of Bad Santa.  I meant to blog about Bad Santa this past Christmas, but I was too busy watching it over and over. 

But Bad Santa was about a guy who had completely given up and (supposedly) didn't believe in anything.  Little Miss Sunshine is about people who are completely consumed with getting something and believing they will get it, only to find out that...well go watch it for yourself and see what happens. All I can say is that if this movie wins then Rick James, wherever he is in the great afterlife, will be very proud.

Read More

Congrats to the New Orleans film group at Sundance

Congratulations to my friends Johnny Denenea and Martin Landrieu.  They're both principals in Anasazi Productions, a local investment group whose first project, “Padre Nuestro,” won the Sundance Film Festival's prize for best U.S. drama this weekend. The film is about a Mexican teen's search for his father in America, and was directed by Christopher Zalla.  Way to go guys!  [See CityBusiness article].

Read More

The Streetcars (sort of) return to St. Charles Ave.

Filming I was delighted last week when I saw workers clearing the streetcar tracks along one small stretch of St. Charles Ave.  And they were doing the same thing over by the yoga studio that I go to, one by Carrolton and Oak St.  Little did I know what was really going on.  I found out the other day when Bruno, my yoga instructor, told us that there would be no classes on Friday due to the filming of a movie. 

Bummer: no streetcars, AND no yoga. 

Read More

Online videos, news aggregators and new technologies

My last post was about YouTube and the phenomemon of online videos.  Digital video is not new.  What's new is that YouTube is allowing technology to be used in a new mode of expression.  When this happens you see the traditional stuff first, things like clips of The Daily Show and even the lawyer advertisement that I linked to

But, over time as people experiment with this new expression of technology you start to see some weirder stuff.  What kind of stuff?  Well, for example, Pug Bowling.  Or, BakuTen - House of Dominos. Ah, this online video stuff is quite interesting.  Well, to some anyways.

I was talking with a friend of mine recently who is quite tech-savvy.  However, she was unfazed by (1) the supposed 'online video phenomenon,' and (2) RSS and news aggregators.  But she has a Treo and, like many Treo users, she'd like to learn more about it.  So it was ironic that after talking to her I was perusing the RSS feeds in my news aggregator and came across this post by Robert Scoble who mentioned a site that has video clips on how to use your Treo.  My friend claims she doesn't read blogs either so she probably won't know this unless I email or call to tell her (who's got time for that?)

One last thought.  Since I'm always quick to make fun of people in government who don't 'get' technology (e.g. Ted Stevens), I should point out that John Edwards (remember him from the last presidential elections?) does 'get it.'  But, the guy who made the Pug Bowling movie is a true internet pioneer.  He's YouTube's Quentin Tarrantino.  I, however, am not Roger Ebert, which raises the question: how did I find out about this movie?  Well, I read about it on Digg, which is sort of like a News Aggregator for content that is ranked by many people.  So many new technologies and so little time to find them, much less explain them to people who don't really care.

Some people don't even think hyperlinks are cool.  I try to avoid these people because they have a stale smell and they bore me to tears.

Read More

Movie Recommendation - 'Godsend' is a bad movie

I like Mark Cuban, and I really like his weblog. So, when I read that he was involved with producing a movie called Godsend that featured Rebecca Romijn-Stamos (who doesn't like her?) and Robert DeNiro, I was more than just a little intrigued. This past weekend I went to see the movie and was very disappointed. Why?

Caution: plot spoiler ahead.

The problem, as I see it, was a screenplay that may have read well as a story but it had no chance of succeeding as a movie. The movie raises the question: what would you do if you were a loving couple with a great eight year old boy who was tragically killed and you were given the chance to clone him and start over? DeNiro plays the brilliant biologist who guarantees the couple played by Stamos and Greg Kinnear that the cloning will be a success. And, at first, it is. Of course, while cloning has the power to give life, using it as a movie plot point can kill the movement of a story because there isn't much room for keeping the suspense going. The movie's attempt to do so winds up being kind of ham-fisted.

The audience yearns for something to happen ('okay we know what he was like when he was eight years old, so let's just fast-forward to that point'). Then when he reaches age eight (the age he was when he died) he starts to 'see dead people' and generally starts acting weird. Now, we're getting somewhere, right? No, not exactly

The main problem is that the movie, or actually the screenplay, starts out suggesting the movie is going to be about the ethical/moral dilemma of cloning (the movie spends much valuable time early on showing that Greg Kinnear is a beloved high-school teacher with an impeccable sense of ethics). But once the movie gets to the actual cloning it dispenses with the 'moral' issue in favor of being a good old fashioned axe-murder scare movie. So, basically, the movie sets up false expectations.

Mark Cuban more or less says he knows that some critics will not like the fact that the movie transitions into a fright flick, but he thinks that the movie is still cool. Apparently, he thinks that his wife (who he says is a 'tough critic') liked it alot. He's hoping that people will have fun with the movie and enjoy it. He predicted that the opening weekend would gross about 7 million and apparently he's right on that score. So, hey, what do I know?

There are clearly a lot of worse ways to spend your time than by watching Rebecca Romijn-Stamos in a poorly conceived movie. Her acting ability may not be up to the level of Greg Kinnear and Robert DeNiro, but she was not in any way a hinderance to the movie. Basically, I blame the screenplay. Some things sound like great ideas, but just have no way of succeeding. That's what some people say about cloning, so maybe that's supposed to be an embeded message of this movie. My take on the movie is simple: it has no soul.

Read More

The Sopranos endorse 'Google'

Say did anyone notice that Adriana (girlfriend to Christopher Moltisanti) mentioned 'Google' in last night's episode? She apparently has some sort of stomach ailment and when she told Tony the name of the acronym (some three-letter deal that I can't remember) he shrugged his shoulder to indicate his complete lack of awareness of the ailment and its central features.

Adriana, who apparently was also confused with her diagnosis, told him that she had 'Googled' the acronym-illness and found out that it was usually caused by stress. Tony didn't balk when she used the term 'Google' so apparently he knows something about Internet search engines. I wonder if he knows about "Google-bombing"?

Read More

Movie Recommendation - The Last Samurai

I really enjoyed The Last Samurai, to the point that I'll probably buy the DVD. This is a movie that highlights the notions of 'honor' and 'dedication to principle.' The Samurai are fierce warriors who have learned the difficult art of battle, but the greatest challenge is deciding when to spare one's enemies and when to kill one's friends. Doesn't make sense, does it? Well, it will if you watch the movie.

Read More

Random thoughts about Big Fish & Swimming to Cambodia

The tendrils of the Internet reach into nooks that other communication methods simply do not reach. In explaining this I will have to be somewhat disjointed (which is how the Internet is).

Awhile back TPB Esq. blogged about how much he liked the movie Big Fish. Mostly on the strength of his recommendation, I went to see the movie. I enjoyed it tremendously (it's a story about the strained relationship between a son and his imaginative, relentlessly story-telling father), which I knew that I would because of what TPB had written about the movie.

Flash forward to recently when Rick Klau posted something that is more than a review of the movie. He talks about taking his son to see a memorable movie called Big Bear (well, 'memorable' for his son), and then goes on to discuss his thoughts on the relationship between fathers and sons. I had the good fortune to meet Rick and his son, albeit briefly, at Disney World more than a year ago (and I'm looking forward to meeting Rick again in two weeks at the ABA Tech Show in Chicago).

Ah, yes. Fathers and sons, and chance encounters with friends. These are truly important things that rarely appear in the headlines of major newspapers.

Unfortunately, it looks like I'll never get a chance to meet a fellow named Spaulding Gray whom I had not heard of until word of his disappearance was announced by several bloggers, including John Perry Barlow. Recently, his body was discovered in New York's East River.

Spaulding Gray took his own life, and apparently he did so shortly after taking his kids to see the movie 'Big Fish'. Spaulding Gray was an actor and, according to most accounts, a somewhat eccentric character. He was known for many things, perhaps least of all for his moderate role in the 1984 movie The Killing Fields.

After reading what John Perry Barlow had to say about Spaulding Gray I was intrigued enough about him to order from Netflix the movie Swimming to Cambodia. The movie is directed by Jonathan Demme (of 'Silence of the Lambs' and 'Stop Making Sense' fame), and captures one of Spaulding Gray's trademark monologue performances in which he discusses varied subjects, such as Southeast Asian politics and the availability of sex and drugs in the Third World.

Clearly, this was a man that I would have liked to have met. I'm also hoping one day to meet John Perry Barlow. I suppose I have my chance tomorrow if I go to Loyola University's Nunemaker Hall at 7;30 pm. There will be a debate on music piracy between Thomas Dolby (of Dolby surround sound and the famous song "She Blinded Me With Science") and John Barlow. I'd like to go but I probably won't. I'm tired of the debate about music piracy and online file-trading. I'd rather talk about something metaphysical, like death and the relationship between fathers and sons, and between good friends.

One thing I'm wondering about: will Spaulding Gray's kids remember that their father took them to see 'Big Fish' right before he decided to jump into the East River and end his life? Years from now, when they see the movie again, what meaning will that movie hold for them? Surely, they'll know it was the last movie that their father took them to go see.

Read More

My Picks for the 76th Academy Awards

I have reviewed the list of nominees for Academy Awards. I haven't seen all of the films, but I can say a few things. Master and Commander should definitely win an award for 'Film Editing' and for 'Best Picture.' If Charlize Theron doesn't win the 'Best Actress' award then there is not even a vestige of legitimacy to the awards.

As I have said already, Bill Murray should not get a 'Best Actor' award for his performance in Lost in Translation; he basically just plays himself. On the other hand, Johnny Depp clearly deserves to win 'Best Actor' for his performance in Pirates of the Caribbean.

I have no opinion about the 'Best Supporting' categories. I really shouldn't have any opinion about the 'Best Director' category because I didn't see Mystic River, but I would like to see Master & Commander win. I liked Lost in Translation, but I don't think that Sophia Coppola should win based on a film that, while fresh and interesting, depended so much on having Bill Murray as the lead actor. Also, I don't think that the Lord of the Rings movies, which were so heavily dependent on special effects, deserve a 'Best Director' award.

But, then, who really cares what I think anyway?

Read More

Batch of Movie Reviews & Commentary

The Oscars are coming up on Sunday night so this post is perhaps appropriately timed. Actually, the reason I'm posting this is because my wife and I just returned from a week long cruise, during which we saw a bunch of movies.

Lost in Translation - great movie because of the fresh, offbeat cinematic style. Writer-director Sophia Coppola (daughter of Francis Ford Coppola, I assume) took some chances with this film and it paid off. One thing that wasn't a 'chance' was casting Bill Murray as the lead character. In fact, I'd have to guess that the movie was specifically written with the idea that he'd play the lead; the movie couldn't have succeeded with any other actor in that role. And for that very reason I don't think that Bill Murray deserves an Academy Award for Best Actor. He's basically playing himself, which makes it hard to call his performance "exceptional." Of course, the Oscars aren't about rewarding people for their talents, so if they give it to him that's fine with me. He deserved it for his performance as Carl the wacked out greenskeeper in Caddyshack so the karmic accounting works out.

Matchstick Men - Speaking of relatives of Francis Ford Coppola, this film with Nicholas Cage is worth seeing. It is not stellar, but it is strange and interesting for most of the movie. The ending is kind of contrived, and that's the only problem with an otherwise novel and engaging screenplay (Nicholas Cage's performance as an obssessive is hampered by the overuse of his usual intense mannerism; he's the epitome of a one-dimensional actor). But the other actors in the movie (particularly the people who play the roles of psychiatrist and con-artist partner) are compelling, and basically carry the film from the acting standpoint.

Intolerable Cruelty - now this is a great movie. I had completely overlooked it when it came out initially (I'm not drawn to romantic comedies because there are so many lame ones), but it totally clicks. Great screenplay (the Coen brothers' apparently were brought in to doctor the screenplay) and great acting by George Clooney and Catherine Zeta-Jones. And the directing--also by the Coen brothers (although only Joel gets credit)-- was outstanding. The Coen brothers' writing and directing is so original and well-conceived that it is hard to give them too much praise.

Master and Commander - This movie should win the Academy Award for Best Picture. It was one of the best movies I have ever seen. Period. Why? Well, the acting by everyone in the movie, especially Russel Crowe, was outstanding, and the cinematic touches were also exceptional. In fact, if they give out Oscars for film-editing then this movie should get one of those awards too.

This is a movie I avoided when it first came out, because it appeared to have a formulaic plot. The plot is not exactly novel, but the manner in which the director holds our suspense (often not revealing the outcome of small things that we can guess, or of larger things that become less important in a later context) was, well, 'masterful.' It would be easy in a movie of this type to over-schlock the contrasting themes of duty (i.e. Russell Crowe's duty as a captain) and pacifisim (in the form of the ship's doctor's scientific curiousity). But that doesn't happen. Instead, there is a wonderful balance and the movie actually stimulates you to think about how the movie's themes would apply in today's world. And the scenery captured in the film is breathtaking.

And now, moving from the sublime to the ridiculous...

School of Rock - I can't believe I'm going to recommend this movie. It has all the originality of a pre-fab house, but somehow Jack Black drags this thing across the finish line. It's not a movie I would go out of my way to see, but if you wind up seeing it (and accept the fact that there is no great redeeming social value to this movie) you are probably going to laugh just enough to make it worth while. If you aren't in touch with your 'inner-adolescent' then definitely avoid this movie like the plague.

Read More